Search for: "State v. Slater" Results 61 - 80 of 196
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2018, 6:19 pm by Zietlow, Rebecca E.
Last week, the United States Supreme Court considered the case of Janus v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:37 am by Michelle Buhalo
Giampolo, Esq.), health and healthcare law (Common Themes in Nursing Home Abuse and Neglect Cases presented by Shayna Slater, Esq. and Naloxone: The Antidote to the Opioid Epidemic? [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
New Zealand In the case of Sellman v Slater [2017] NZHC 2392, the blogger Cameron Slater (Whale Oil), public relations man Carrick Graham and former MP Katherine Rich failed in an application to strike out a libel claim by three health experts. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:47 am by Ben
And in Access Copyright v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In Craig v Slater, a proceeding heard recently over four weeks by Toogood J (sitting without a jury), two pre-trial decisions are of note. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
” New Zealand A judge has heard closing submissions in the defamation case of Colin Craig v Cameron Slater. [read post]
31 May 2017, 5:06 pm by Lorene Park
After pondering the challenges posed by the legalization of marijuana, a Rhode Island superior court held that Darlington Fabrics violated the state’s Hawkins-Slater Act by refusing to hire an intern because she held a medical marijuana card. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States Blog Law Online has a post dealing with the question “Is journalism harassment? [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A California patient privacy case has reached the state´s Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 1:06 am by Jani Ihalainen
The US District Court did look at non-human authorship some time ago in Naruto v Slater (discussed more here and here), and maintained that non-humans cannot have authorship in works, which has been established some time in the US judiciary (specifically referring to 'humans' or 'persons'). [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
 US District Judge William Orrick ruled that the monkey, who borrowed British photographer David Slater's camera and took the selfies, cannot own the copyright in the pictures. [read post]