Search for: "State v. Speck" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2019, 8:28 am by scanner1
State DA 18-0404 2019 MT 124N Civil – Postconviction Matter of K.L., YINC DA 18-0425 2019 MT 123N Civil – Dependent Neglect State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 10:10 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The Federal Circuit’s new decision in Myco Industries v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:19 am by James Trusty
If appellate courts begin to consider 1 United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:55 am
Michael Silverleaf QC also made submissions on behalf of the Secretary of State for Health. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm by Alice O'Brien
This court searches for specks of religious discrimination buried in a bureaucracy when deciding whether LGBTQ people have the right to purchase wedding services (Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:35 pm by Liisa Speaker
’” People v Gioglio, 296 Mich App 12 (2012), quoting Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668, 688, 694; 104 St Ct 2052; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984). [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:12 am by Rick Hills
We had horse doctors’ doses of that sort of “rights” jurisprudence from the pre-Miller v California days, when the SCOTUS used to apply First Amendment obscenity doctrine by watching porno flicks in chambers. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 10:00 pm by Michael
Tax reports have not been filed to the state in more than a decade. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:43 am
Emma QC has been involved in some of the IPKat's favourite legal disputes, including Interflora v Marks & Spencer, Matratzen Concord v Hukla and one case which, in this Kat's opinion, should never have been allowed to go to court, Reed v Reed. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 11:59 am by Kevin
The published opinion I referred to in my earlier post, United States v. [read post]