Search for: "State v. Speller" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
  Although a plaintiff is not required to identify a specific defect in a circumstantial case, plaintiff's theory here -- that the explosion resulted from a manufacturing defect in the form of an "internal electrical fault" -- is pure speculation.A read of Speller v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:06 am by Mandelman
  Patricia’s daughter continues in her declaration to state what anyone would have to agree is the obvious. [read post]