Search for: "State v. Sprague" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Samantha Barbas, Actual Malice:  Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 6:34 am by Nassiri Law
Additional Resources: Spokane Valley Fire Captain Terminated for Religious Messages Can Sue, State Supreme Court Finds, Jan. 26. 2018, By Ryan Collingwood, The Spokesman-Review Sprague v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In dissent, Chief Judge Fearing argued the department had opened the email system to religious messages by forwarding newsletters from its health insurer about solving personal problems and living a healthy lifestyle, because the government may not “prefer secular chatter over religious oration” (Sprague v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Decisions involving an employee’s use of the employer's electronic equipment that resulted in disciplinary action being taken against an employee [Internet links highlighted in color]Sprague v Spokane Valley Fire Department Sprague v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 3:30 pm by Ron Miller
Those rights notwithstanding, a Washington fire captain’s persistent use of the fire department’s internal email system to disseminate Christian messages to coworkers were not enough to save him from discharge for engaging in such conduct, ruled a Washington Court of Appeal in Sprague v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 6:40 am by Joy Waltemath
In dissent, Chief Judge Fearing argued the department had opened the email system to religious messages by forwarding newsletters from its health insurer about solving personal problems and living a healthy lifestyle, because the government may not “prefer secular chatter over religious oration” (Sprague v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 8:57 am
Our analysis reveals that privacy law in the United States comports most closely with the Georgia Supreme Court’s 1905 description of privacy from the seminal case Pavesich v. [read post]