Search for: "State v. Square" Results 201 - 220 of 6,573
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Article I, §10 specifically states that “[n]o state shall . . . pass any . . . [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:06 am by Ben
Calling the blocks "ineffectual", the court also stated that the blockades "constitute an infringement of [people's] freedom to act at their discretion". [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s decision last month in the Morrison v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 3:42 am
Franklin and State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Amanda L. Tyler
On Dec. 11, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia heard arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:13 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The New York Times' "Square Feet" column today posted "Lessons on Limits of Eminent Domain at Columbia," about the recent decision in Kaur v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:24 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Russell presents the Supreme Court with its first opportunity to squarely apply J. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:26 am by Joy Waltemath
A grouping of oil rigs spread across 75,000 square miles over two states was not a single site of employment for purposes of WARN Act liability, ruled the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:10 am by Eleanor Mitchell, Matrix
The Supreme Court will spend the first half of this week hearing the appeals in three related cases: R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:00 am by Eleanor Mitchell, Matrix
In a previous post, we considered the factual background to the appeals before the Supreme Court this week in the cases of R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:04 am by Jon Robinson
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:31 am by Lauren Gilbert - Guest
District Judge Bolton enjoined enforcement of various provisions, a decision later upheld by the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]