Search for: "State v. Square" Results 221 - 240 of 6,469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2011, 1:18 pm by Calvin Massey
  The question squarely presented in that grant is whether the Medicaid expansion that is part of the optimistically named "Affordable Care Act" is void because it is coercive, under the framework established by South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 12:56 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
This week, the Tennessee Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Wheelock v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 2:20 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: In his 1929 encyclical, Divini Illius Magistri (On Christian Education), Pope Pius XI paid an extraordinary tribute to the United States, the Supreme Court, and more specifically, the Court’s interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment in Pierce v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:06 pm by Orin Kerr
United States, 436 U.S. 128, 130-43 (1978); United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:16 am
Haddad, et al., (Complaint, United States District Court for Connecticut, 18-CV-00055), the SEC  alleges that Haddad operated Trafalgar Square Risk Management, LLC and New England RE, LLC and that he raised at lease $2.5 million from 29 investors through the offer and sale of unregistered securities in each company. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:14 am
, (Complaint, United States District Court for Connecticut, 18-CV-00055), the SEC  alleges that Haddad operated Trafalgar Square Risk Management, LLC and New England RE, LLC and that he raised at least $2.5 million from 29 investors through the offer and sale of unregistered securities in each company. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 4:10 pm
Here is the abstract:On June 26, 2008, the United States Supreme Court handed down its 5-4 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 8:20 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Kavanaugh and Justice Stephen Breyer questioned Park about the possibility of multiple, rampant state uses of copyrights for which the authors receive nothing, which cannot be squared with a grant of exclusive rights. [read post]