Search for: "State v. Square" Results 21 - 40 of 6,581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2024, 4:37 am by Ambrosio Rodriguez
Schedule V Substances contained in Schedule V have a lower chance of dependency than Schedule IV substances. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 5:50 am by Mary B. McCord
Even though national militia networks have been weakened in the years since January 6th, paramilitary actors across the nation are engaged in unlawful efforts to bully, harass, and force their perceived opponents out of the public square. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 10:26 am by Jacob Fishman
That consensus is difficult to square with the plausible claim that deciding even close cases by coin toss is not only morally but legally objectionable. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 4:30 am by Peter J. Sluka
  The United States District Court for the Southern District of California wasn’t buying it (JAE Properties, Inc. v AMTAX Holdings 2001-XX, LLC, 3:19-CV-02075 [SD Cal Feb. 9, 2024]). [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 12:25 am by Frank Cranmer
Higgs v Farmor’s School The appeal in Higgs v Farmor’s School (Religion and belief – direct discrimination) [2023] EAT 89 is being live-streamed on Wednesday and Thursday. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 11:10 am by Katelynn Minott, CPA & CEO
Sotheby’s, Engel & Völkers, RE/MAX) often have English-speaking agents. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Luongo v Records Access Officer, Civilian Complaint Review Bd., 150 AD3d 13, the Appellate Division opined "Statutes should be interpreted in a manner designed to effectuate the legislature's intent, construing clear and unambiguous statutory language so as to give effect to the plain meaning of the words used".The Appellate Division's decision also held that Foundation's intended use of the requested information to contact individual… [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Luongo v Records Access Officer, Civilian Complaint Review Bd., 150 AD3d 13, the Appellate Division opined "Statutes should be interpreted in a manner designed to effectuate the legislature's intent, construing clear and unambiguous statutory language so as to give effect to the plain meaning of the words used".The Appellate Division's decision also held that Foundation's intended use of the requested information to contact individual… [read post]