Search for: "State v. Stahl" Results 81 - 100 of 115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by Ted Tjaden
His claim for such a right ended up in a Supreme Court ruling in his favour in Gideon v Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963). [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
Johnson, which overruled State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 12:56 pm
  But the Ninth Circuit holds otherwise, and reverses the grant of summary judgment to the United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:57 am by Michael Perry
Stahl Associates (1989); Nabozny v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 4:55 am by Russ Bensing
The third case in the trilogy was State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:42 pm by Bexis
  That [the first prescriber] might have heeded a warning. . .about possible adverse effects were he to prescribe Isocet to [plaintiff] in 1997 is of no significance given the facts before us.Id.The Plaintiff in Stahl v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:28 am by Beck, et al.
Federal Insurance Co., 499 F.3d 692, 700 (7th Cir. 2007) (label change); Stahl v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:23 am
    Stahl involved a statement to a nurse, not a police officer, and the court completely misses that in State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 9:48 am
The shameful Court of Appeals precedent is Matter of Alison D. v. [read post]