Search for: "State v. Stokes"
Results 241 - 260
of 443
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2016, 8:45 am
Taiwanese Deputy Foreign Minister Bruce Linghu announced a media tour of Taiping (Itu Aba), which took place on Wednesday, as part of a larger diplomatic blitz in advance of the upcoming merits decision in the Philippines v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:02 am
Given the tendency of this kind of publicity to stoke flames related to competing claims on the islands, this can perhaps be read as an ominous sign for the year to come. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 10:19 am
As it noted all the way back in 1838 in Kendall v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:01 pm
Susan flagged the Department of Justice’s motion to vacate the preliminary injunction in Klayman v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 7:05 am
As recently stated by this Court in People v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 1:27 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Soriano had cited Stokes v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
Accord, e.g., Stokes v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
” (Elonis v United States, 16). [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 11:43 am
In contrast, Barnett pointed to the Court’s 1896 decision in Plessy v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 12:11 pm
ADT, LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 12:35 pm
” Hooper v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 8:07 am
Walker v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 5:28 am
At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen looks ahead to Fisher v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 6:47 am
Stokes argued the seminal “stop and frisk” case of Terry v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:11 am
On Friday, he stated that Iranian policy would not change against the “arrogant” United States, in comments that Secretary of State John Kerry today deemed “disturbing. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 pm
He was co-counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:47 am
Wickard v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:30 am
One of my favorites concerned the 1953 California appellate court case, Banks v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:35 am
It was the case of Grant v. [read post]
