Search for: "State v. Stuart"
Results 1 - 20
of 921
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
” As stated by Stuart E. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
In commenting on Murthy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
The debate over what is often termed “jawboning” will come before the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:57 am
Or is this more of a Brigham City v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
In that context, the baseline problem is strongly associated with Cass Sunstein, and especially with his analysis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Lochner v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:05 pm
This note will touch on the concepts of personal liberty in the context of abortion in the landmark case Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 3:10 am
Stuart Harrow, a longtime Defense Department employee, was furloughed in 2013 due to federal budget cuts. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:36 pm
Jones, and Stuart Kyle Duncan, reversed the District Court’s decision. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[2] In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Davis II Chair in Law Emeritus The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law David A. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:00 pm
In Lewis v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Prince, Penn State Dickinson Law ERISA plan fiduciaries must be permitted to consider ESG factors when selecting plan investments. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 9:00 am
Stuart N. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:08 am
Holland & Knight v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
” Stuart Harrow, a Defense Department employee, was furloughed because of budget shortfalls. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
