Search for: "State v. Sullivan" Results 1 - 20 of 2,679
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 7:22 pm by Amy Howe
Sullivan, holding that “informal, indirect government efforts to suppress or penalize speech by threatening private intermediaries violate the First Amendment. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 7:17 pm by Amy Howe
Sullivan that “informal, indirect government efforts to suppress or penalize speech by threatening private intermediaries violate the First Amendment. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637 [2018], affd 35 NY3d 173 [2020]; see CPLR 3016 [b]; Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, 200 AD3d 785, 787 [2021]). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
These include the following, among other indicators: (i) the acquirer is “well-capitalized” and the resulting institution will be “well-capitalized”; (ii) the acquirer has a Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”) rating of Outstanding or Satisfactory; (iii) the resulting institution will have total assets of less than $50 billion; (iv) the acquirer has composite, management and consumer compliance ratings of 1 or 2; and (v) the acquirer has… [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Is there anything but Sullivan that makes private causes of action into state action? [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
” In reality, Rule 1.8.5(a) does state the general bar on such payments. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The drug price-fixing conspiracy – which became the focus of investigations by the Department of Justice, 49 state attorney generals, and Congress– has embroiled the generic pharmaceutical industry. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Gianna Hill
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Omnicom Grp., Inc., 852 F.3d 195, 200 (2d Cir. 2017) (finding plausible discriminatory intent where a supervisor explicitly stated that an openly gay plaintiff “must have AIDS” because he was “effeminate and gay”; Sassaman v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Taylor Gulatsi
The State Law Libraries Outreach Initiative to strengthen the ties between the Law Library of Congress and state law libraries continues. [read post]