Search for: "State v. Sullivan" Results 21 - 40 of 2,706
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm by Futeral & Nelson, LLC
Code Section 20-3-130 states that in a South Carolina divorce, “the court may grant alimony or separate maintenance and support in such amounts and for such term as the court considers appropriate as from the circumstances of the parties and the nature of the case may be just, [temporarily], and permanently. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
“Foreign person” means anyone that is not a United States citizen, national, or lawful permanent resident; any individual admitted to the United States as a refugee under 8 U.S.C. 1157 or granted asylum under 8 U.S.C. 1158; any entity organized solely under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches); or any person in the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
Sullivan for the New York Times and remained committed to liberal causes in the political realm. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm by Will Baude
Sullivan principle applies to such entities strikes me as a different and further question from what Biden v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:27 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Prominent historical examples, like the liberal justices who advanced press freedom in New York Times v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:16 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court finds the plaintiff may proceed with his case even through his Article 78 was not successful.The case is Whitfield v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:22 pm by Amy Howe
Sullivan, holding that “informal, indirect government efforts to suppress or penalize speech by threatening private intermediaries violate the First Amendment. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 7:17 pm by Amy Howe
Sullivan that “informal, indirect government efforts to suppress or penalize speech by threatening private intermediaries violate the First Amendment. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637 [2018], affd 35 NY3d 173 [2020]; see CPLR 3016 [b]; Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, 200 AD3d 785, 787 [2021]). [read post]