Search for: "State v. Sullivan"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,431
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The Town Attorney had concluded that Town Law §81 did not permit a referendum concerning term limits.Finding that there was no statutory basis for a public referendum on this particular issue, the Appellate Division ruled that Plaintiffs' petition failed to adequately allege a clear legal right to the relief Plaintiffs sought and sustained the Supreme Court's granting the Respondents' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' petition for failure to state a cause of actionThe… [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The Town Attorney had concluded that Town Law §81 did not permit a referendum concerning term limits.Finding that there was no statutory basis for a public referendum on this particular issue, the Appellate Division ruled that Plaintiffs' petition failed to adequately allege a clear legal right to the relief Plaintiffs sought and sustained the Supreme Court's granting the Respondents' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' petition for failure to state a cause of actionThe… [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:28 am
We also agree with the Supreme Court’s determination denying that branch of the defendant’s motion which was based upon CPLR 3211(a)(3) to dismiss the fourth cause of action insofar as asserted against the defendant for lack of standing (see General Obligations Law § 13-101; Greevy v Becker, Isserlis, Sullivan & Kurtz, 240 AD2d 539, 541). [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 8:14 am
Editor’s Note: These are the results of the fifth semi-annual Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey conducted by ComplexDiscovery. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:10 am
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 9:52 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
Sullivan, Esq. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 12:52 pm
Emmett Sullivan. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 3:47 am
However, the recent Second Circuit opinion, Sullivan-Mestecky v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
This is what the Court of Appeal For Ontario decided in the case of R v Sullivan. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
This is what the Court of Appeal For Ontario decided in the case of R v Sullivan. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:49 am
Sullivan is an assistant solicitor general with the Colorado Attorney General’s office, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of nine states in support of respondents in Espinoza v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:42 pm
The court’s decision comes just days before the rule’s June 30 compliance date (XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:36 am
" In Flynn, as in Bush v. [read post]
Latest Twist in the Flynn Case Highlights the Danger of Judicial Deference to Trump’s Administration
24 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
’”Judge Sullivan was seeking to make just such a determination. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
This statute was mentioned by the Court in 1988 as support for its opinion in the famous independent counsel case, Morrison v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
SHAK v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:22 am
The danger of being the enforcer The plaintiff in Sullivan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:26 am
” Conners v. [read post]