Search for: "State v. Summerlin" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2010, 9:41 am by Jon Sands
The Supremes said that Ring (requiring capital jury sentencing) was not retroactive in Summerlin, 542 U.S. 348 (2004) but that states could apply Ring retroactively. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:23 am by David DePaolo
Supreme Court's precedent ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2006, 12:17 pm
Summerlin addressed the retroactivity of Ring v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
I’m delighted to say that the Nebraska Supreme Court has just agreed to review State v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of the place within the jurisdiction of which the crime was committed, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:18 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Washington (2004)), and a similar issue in the federal guidelines system (United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:00 am by Amy Howe
 Summerlin “is safe. [read post]