Search for: "State v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 12,484
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
In so ruling ,the Superior Court followed the reasoning of the united States Court of Appeals of the Third Circuit in State Farm v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court's opinion yesterday in County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 4:56 am
In doing so, the Court explicitly stated that the Tribe’s rights were “substantially prejudiced” as a result of the Department’s actions. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
Oracle Corp. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 1191, 1206 [under UCL, California employer’s failure to pay overtime wages to out-of-state employees was an unlawful business practice]; Tomlinson v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 7:48 am
Generally speaking, cases begin at the trial court level; in Georgia, that is State or Superior Court or, if federal, District Court. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 8:04 am
Superior Court (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 487, 514-515 (discussed here) and Nelsen v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:00 am
In light of this ruling, the judgment in the underlying case was vacated.Interestingly, the Superior Court noted that the previous decision in the case of Trigg v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
The Pennsylvania Superior Court revisited the Trivial Defect Doctrine most recently in the case of Reinoso v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
In recent split decision by the Superior Court in the case of Gregury v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:02 pm
ErosionThe Pennsylvania Superior Court recently upheld a household exclusion in the case of Erie Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 5:00 am
In the case of Hassel v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:07 pm
In Lidow v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 9:04 am
The closest case, I think, is State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 11:17 am
Shopbell v State of Washington Tribal Court Complaint for Declaratory Judgment Injunction and Other Equitable Relief Paul v State of Washington Superior Court Complaint for Writ of Replevin and for Return of Property [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Morgan Tire & Auto, LLC), ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jun. 4, 2013), the Court of Appeal (Sixth Appellate District) followed the lead of the other Brown case, and held that a "no-class-or-representative-action" arbitration clause could not defeat the plaintiffs' statutory right to bring a representative PAGA claim and seek penalties on behalf of the state. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 5:00 am
In the case Ruff v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 12:24 pm
In State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
The Frye standard of review of novel expert testimony was reaffirmed by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the following two recent decisions.Snizavich v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
The Frye standard of review of novel expert testimony was reaffirmed by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the following two recent decisions.Snizavich v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Nat'l Western Life Ins. [read post]
