Search for: "State v. Sutton" Results 241 - 260 of 682
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am by John Elwood
Garza, 17-654 Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:46 am by Kelly Mihocik
Judge Sutton dissented in part, stating that he would have affirmed the dismissal of the post-termination liability claim. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:46 am by Kelly Mihocik
Judge Sutton dissented in part, stating that he would have affirmed the dismissal of the post-termination liability claim. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 6:32 am by Joy Waltemath
Judge Sutton dissented in part, finding that because the employer did not actually enforce the post-termination repayment part of the policy, that provision did not violate the FLSA (Stein v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am by Victoria Kwan
On September 19, retired Justice David Souter shared the stage with Judge Jeffrey Sutton of the U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 6:58 am by Jason Shinn
But the Supreme Court later in Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc, decided that with corrective measures (in Sutton the issue were corrective lenses) to mitigate the plaintiff’s impairment did not substantially limit a major life activity and therefore they were not disabled. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 6:58 am by Jason Shinn
But the Supreme Court later in Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc, decided that with corrective measures (in Sutton the issue were corrective lenses) to mitigate the plaintiff’s impairment did not substantially limit a major life activity and therefore they were not disabled. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 12:18 pm
Now Judge Jeffrey Sutton of the Sixth Circuit has written a concurrence in a decision, United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:31 pm by Jamie Baker
Sutton’s article Is There a Doctor (And a Lawyer) In The House? [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm by Jamie Baker
Beyer was a speaker at the 51st Annual Fiduciary Law Institute sponsored by the State Bar of Georgia Institute of Continuing Legal Education. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 4:30 am by koherston
When Child was 17 years old, the State petitioned to establish paternity and require the father to provide health insurance for Child. [read post]