Search for: "State v. Sutton"
Results 301 - 320
of 610
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2015, 1:29 pm
Texas and United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
In his opinion for 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, last November, upholding the constitutionality of state non-recognition of same-sex marriage and provoking the Supreme Court to take up the issue, Judge Jeffrey Sutton asserted that, “If it is constitutionally irrational to stand by the man-woman definition of marriage, it must be constitutionally irrational to stand by the monogamous definition of marriage. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:16 pm
Harkening to doubts expressed by Judge Sutton in his United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:43 am
United States Congress, 2015 U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 8:52 am
Following Judge Sutton, the states will argue that the issue of marriage equality ought to be worked out state by state. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:12 pm
Feeney, and Romer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:31 pm
Another good reason to review Judge Sutton’s opinion is how he aptly addresses both Loving v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
“The state of mind of the accused infringer is notrelevant to this objective inquiry. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
Sutton) & Richard L. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:07 am
In the second case this morning, Elonis v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 10:09 am
Sutton, __ N.C. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 8:23 am
According to the district court in Kalitta Air, LLC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am
” In an op-ed at Constitution Daily, Doug Kendall and Brianne Gorod analyze the Sixth Circuit’s recent opinion upholding bans on same-sex marriage (and the recognition of those marriages) in four states; they argue that, although there “are a lot of problems with Judge Sutton’s opinion, . . . one in particular makes clear why his decision can’t stand when the Supreme Court ultimately rules on marriage equality: If Jeff Sutton is right,Loving… [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
United States (Redux). [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:09 am
” At Comparative Patent Remedies, Thomas Cotter discusses the invitation brief filed by the Solicitor General recently in Kimble v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
In the interim, it is possible that the Sixth Circuit case, Bourke, et al. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am
Loving v. [read post]
