Search for: "State v. Swain" Results 41 - 60 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2009, 8:00 am
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memo by partners at Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP.) [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 4:17 pm by Florian Mueller
In the latter case, Gibson Dunn worked for Apple's contract manufacturers (Foxconn/Hon Hai, Pegatron, Compal, and Wistron)--and squared off with the very firm on the other side that filed Epic Games' complaints against Apple and Google: Cravath, Swaine & Moore of New York City.The first Epic Games v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 7:19 am by Will Aitchison
More evidence that courts are tightening up on multi-state FLSA collective actions comes from Vasquez v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 11:09 am by Josh H. Escovedo
She also stated that the rings were being promoted on signs within the store as Tiffany diamond engagement rings. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 10:56 am by OxFirst
It discusses, among other matters, the Second Circuit’s recent decision in Castillo v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:25 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) L’Oreal SA & Ors v Bellure NV & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 535 (21 May 2010) Re W (Children) [2010] EWCA Civ 537 (20 May 2010) Groveholt Ltd v Hughes & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 538 (20 May 2010) MJ (Angola) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 557 (20 May 2010) Condron, R (on the application of) v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 534 (20 May 2010) Nessa… [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 11:43 am by Venkat Balasubramani
We’ve blogged about state laws directed at ownership of (and privacy regarding) employee social media [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 6:05 am by Gene Quinn
Kappos, a life-long employee of IBM prior to taking charge of the USPTO, is now with Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP in New York City. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm by Jon Sands
The superior court had dismissed his state habeas petition as "untimely and unmeritorious;" the California Court of Appeal denied his state habeas petition without comment; and the California Supreme Court denied it with "see" citations to In re Swain, 209 P.2d 793 (Cal. 1949), and People v. [read post]