Search for: "State v. Swain" Results 81 - 100 of 174
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2014, 1:23 pm by Michael Lumer
Judge Swain ultimately decided to stay matters in that litigation until at least November, based on the already pending Kerik v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm by David Kappos
David Kappos is a partner at Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP and the former Director of the U.S. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 8:18 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: SHELLEY MOORE v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:55 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
How fitting for Michigan to take this major first step in aligning its practices with the requirements of the United States Constitution during this 50th anniversary year of the Gideon v Wainwright decision, which guaranteed counsel to indigent defendants facing prison time. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 6:05 am by Gene Quinn
Kappos, a life-long employee of IBM prior to taking charge of the USPTO, is now with Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP in New York City. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:42 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has held that the Americans with Disabilities Act may require the state to waive certain eligibility deadlines if waiver would reasonably accommodate a disabled person under the Act.The case is Mary Jo C. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Sheldon Toplitt
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Laura Taylor Swain this week in John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:27 am by Kevin LaCroix
In an interesting opinion that includes among other things a noteworthy discussion of issues arising under the Morrison v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 11:31 am by emagraken
 The Court of Appeal stated the duty of a driver toward children in Brewster (Guardian ad litem of) v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 11:31 am by emagraken
The Court of Appeal stated the duty of a driver toward children in Brewster (Guardian ad litem of) v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:40 am by Schachtman
Why did the three judges involved (Judge Breyer in the federal MDL; Justice Kornreich in the New York state cases; and Judge Swain in the federal securities putative class action) give such cursory attention to these Rule 702/Frye challenges? [read post]