Search for: "State v. Swanson" Results 81 - 100 of 115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2011, 5:10 pm by Rick Hasen
Swanson had two holdings: (1) the state ban on corporate contributions to candidates remains constitutional even after Citizens United and (2) the state’s rules for disclosure of certain political activity are constitutional. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:06 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Daniel Schwartz chimes in on yesterday's hot topic, Thompson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:27 pm
As far back as 1954, the Supreme Court of Canada stated this principle clearly in Wilson v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 12:35 pm by Lyle Denniston
Swanson (application 10A422).  [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Similarly, if someone’s cat does not roam outdoors, it can remain unaltered.SB 250 does not cost the state any money. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm by Jeff Gamso
That voters approved Proposition 8 denying same-sex couples the right to marry, Judge Walker said, is irrelevant sincefundamental rights may not be submitted to [a] vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.That's a quote from the Supreme Court's 1943 decision in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:54 pm by John Hochfelder
Plaintiff’s attorney, Christopher Meagher, obtained another huge malpractice verdict in Westchester County in December 2009 - $61,000,000 (including $22,000,000 for pain and suffering) in Swanson v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 8:18 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Herbert Boyer (Boyer) and a businessman named Robert Swanson (Swanson) joined forces to form a venture to exploit biotechnology. [read post]