Search for: "State v. Swindle" Results 1 - 20 of 105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2014, 7:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Yet the District Court concluded that Appellants could not, as a matter of law, pursue their North Dakota common-law claims against Appellees simply because Appellees involved the United States in their swindle. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 4:30 pm
“Chutzpah” is about the most polite word I could come up with for the appellant’s audacity in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:22 am by admin
Judge Robert Sweet of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York stated in the case of Sharkey v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
“It is critical to recognize that Chapter 1 of the [professional code of conduct] demands of all lawyers a duty of absolute honesty, not only with justice system participants, but with the public at large,” states the ruling.Throughout the proceedings, Smith maintained his innocence and insisted that his conduct was not improper. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:15 pm by Eric Goldman
This is a clean and decisive ruling, but it’s not the first time that a court has used Section 230 to reject an RTBF-style claim in the United States. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 6:00 am by LTA-Editor
By Shira Zucker This August, Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Texas ruled in SEC v. [read post]