Search for: "State v. Tandy"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm
The Supreme Court, in Lord Sales judgment, restates the starting position, as per R v East Sussex County Council, Ex p Tandy (1998) AC 714, that where Parliament imposes a statutory duty on a public authority to provide a specific benefit or service, it does so on the footing that the authority must be taken to have the resources available to comply with that duty. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
However, reaching this milestone and the overall constructive tone conveyed by Member States at last week’s SOTF Ministerial Meeting belies three underlying fault-lines that must be navigated skillfully to achieve meaningful progress, namely: renewed Great Power rivalries, resurfaced Global North-South tensions, and lingering distrust between certain Member States with the U.N. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
A podcast on Buchanan v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 9:30 pm
" (Senate Progressives v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:02 am
—Corpus Christi 1990, no writ); Tandy v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
ICYMI: Recent assessments of the Supreme Court's attempt to distinguish Korematsu from Trump v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:37 pm
United States, 527 U. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:45 am
Cette jurisprudence a été appliquée de façon très stricte par le United States Patent and Trademark Office de telle façon qu’il est maintenant beaucoup plus difficile de breveter des méthodes diagnostiques. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am
Automated Solutions Corporation v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
-Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, no writ); Tandy Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:27 am
”); see Tandy Corp. v. [read post]
The SEC and Small Capital Formation: The Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging Companies (Part 1)
17 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
Catherine V. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:12 am
Tandy, 2011 U.S. [read post]
25 May 2010, 6:40 am
The Court on Monday also granted certiorari in Henry Skinner v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:08 am
State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 9:33 am
Although the state [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:48 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Cory Bailey v. [read post]
