Search for: "State v. Tate" Results 1 - 20 of 423
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2025, 9:30 pm by ernst
NixonAllen Boyer reviews Tate, Power and Justice in Medieval England and Eldridge, Law and the Medieval Village CommunityJerry Edwards reviews Barbas, Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 7:38 am by David Pocklington
In a later case of nuisance by interference with the enjoyment of residential property (Fearn v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery [2023] UKSC 4), the Supreme Court made it clear that there is no need, or any justification, for invoking human rights law when the common law has already developed tried and tested principles, under the tort of nuisance, which determine when liability arises for this type of legal wrong [16]. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  The National Historical Publications and Records Commission awarded the University of Cincinnati's Archives and Rare Books Library a grant to complete the processing of the records of the Cincinnati Branch of the NAACP related to the Bronson v. [read post]
In assessing whether a restriction on Second Amendment rights can be constitutionally, the decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am by Telecommunications Practice Group
Section 253 provides that “no [s]tate or local statute or regulation, or other [s]tate or local legal requirement, may prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the ability of any entity to provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service. [read post]