Search for: "State v. Tate"
Results 121 - 140
of 406
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
Explaining that it is "well-settled [s]tate policy that appointments and promotions within the civil service system must be merit-based and, when 'practicable,' determined by competitive examination," as mandated by Article V §6 of the State Constitution, opined that "[t]he constitutional dictate does not create an absolute bar to civil service appointments and promotions without competitive examinations. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 2:24 pm
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Bad acts Convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County of distribution of cocaine and related offenses, Donald Edward Tate, appellant, presents for our review two questions: whether the court “allow[ed] inadmissible hearsay into evidence,” and whether the court “allow[ed] inadmissible and prejudicial ‘other ... [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 5:52 pm
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 5:52 pm
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 5:51 pm
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 5:51 pm
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 5:51 pm
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 5:51 pm
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 1:44 pm
Lewis v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 1:14 pm
In his timely appeal, Tate, representing himself, argues that States must provide “juvenile lifers,” like himself, a meaningful opportunity to obtain release from prison based on ... [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 2:07 pm
Questions which state the answer within themselves are just a series of rhetorical questions. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:19 am
Tate to testify concerning the reason she was afraid of him ... [read post]
24 May 2021, 7:57 am
Henderson v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:05 am
In Preterm-Cleveland v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 5:12 am
” Texas was also the venue for Sanches v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:59 am
Bell v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Co. v Investors Ins. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Co. v Investors Ins. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
MAGARINO, Petitioner, v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am
Last year, the High Court decision in Fearn v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery ([2019] EWHC 246 (Ch)) bolstered common law privacy protections as Mann J acknowledged that invasions of domestic privacy could support an action in private nuisance. [read post]
