Search for: "State v. Texas City" Results 401 - 420 of 2,699
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2020, 1:55 pm by Tamsen Barrett (US)
For example, the Eastern District of Texas recently determined it had personal jurisdiction over a foreign defendant because the defendant had sufficient control–it not only imported products for sale through a Texas city, but also directly or indirectly imported lighting products for sale in Texas specifically. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 12:13 pm by Ilya Somin
In each of these cases, Trump administration priorities clashed with longstanding legal commitments of conservative jurists, such as textualism (Bostock), originalism (several cases), federalism (sanctuary cities), and separation of powers (sanctuary cities, Trump v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by admin
All four states had certified their results before Texas filed its audacious lawsuit. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by Schachtman
All four states had certified their results before Texas filed its audacious lawsuit. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The collector can sue the officer, the LAPD, and the city too. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:06 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Supreme Court decision in Village of Euclid v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
New York also has one of the highest state cigarette taxes ($4.35 per pack), not counting the additional local New York City cigarette tax ($1.50 per pack). [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
In one case that I found astonishing as a law student, City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 6:43 am by James Romoser
The state’s response to the Catholic diocese’s challenge is due Wednesday, and its response to the Jewish organizations’ challenge is due Friday. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 10:59 am by Eugene Volokh
City of Albuquerque (N.M. 2015) (holding that "the right to vote is fundamental"); Griego v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm by fjhinojosa
Gonzalez is cited in the following case: Kim Cramton v. [read post]