Search for: "State v. Texas City"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,729
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2020, 10:59 am
City of Albuquerque (N.M. 2015) (holding that "the right to vote is fundamental"); Griego v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
Gonzalez is cited in the following case: Kim Cramton v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 10:30 am
Texas. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 12:50 pm
Supreme Court in Brownback v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 10:48 am
These and other petitions of the week are below: City of San Antonio, Texas v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
City of Philadelphia. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:15 am
” Outside of Baylor, he is a Texas Bar Foundation fellow, a member of the State Bar of Texas Local Bar Services Committee, a barrister in the Judge Abner V. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
”[5] In Bush v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
”[5] In Bush v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
After Bush v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm
Pro-First Amendment group challenges University of Texas at Austin campus speech code, alleging that its vague terms chill protected speech. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am
Texas—and argues that while the Court may not overturn the law, future major legislation passed by a Democratic president and Congress will face a tough road with the Justices. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 11:30 am
In the Pennsylvania case, Trump v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:30 pm
Finally, it notes that all existing state orders are amended to eliminate jail as a penalty for violating either an executive order or any similar locally issued orders. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
Some states, such as Florida, Oklahoma, Georgia, Maine and Texas, mandate that mail ballots be received by election officials no later than Election Day in order to be counted. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 1:47 pm
City of Philadelphia, which involves the intersection of nondiscrimination laws and religious rights, and California v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:54 am
In NAACP v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:54 am
In NAACP v. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 10:21 pm
As plaintiff is a Texas resident, and his sole remaining retaliation claim is asserted under a section of the Texas Labor Law, the motion court providently exercised its discretion in dismissing that claim on the ground of forum non conveniens, pursuant to CPLR 327[a].Kingston v. [read post]
