Search for: "State v. Texas City"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2018, 11:34 am
DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 8, 2018 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01064-CV SM ARCHITECTS, PLLC AND ROGER STEPHENS, Appellants V. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
In Hurst v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 9:11 am
See City of Keller v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:18 am
Loewy’s article Why Roe v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 9:38 am
In Duval County Texas, 1948, “Parr was the Godfather. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
City of Escondido, California, v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:57 am
They then turn to less desirable drugs, raising the danger of protracted and possibly painful executions with resulting litigation and delay.The State of Texas has a collateral challenge going to this decision in the Southern District of Texas, Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:46 am
Boca Raton and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:14 am
Facts: This case (Albert Sidney Johnston Chapter et al v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
The case study is used to debate the data protection implications of a data-oriented city development. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 11:50 am
City of Chicago. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Pierce v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
For example, in 2017 Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed a ban on sanctuary cities. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 8:50 am
The trial court, in Ruff v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
State Bar of California and Lathrop v. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 8:09 am
Ameren Illinois Company v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Texas Values v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
Texas, a Supreme Court decision from 2017, to find that an Ohio court unreasonably applied Atkins v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:11 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In his opinion in Brackeen v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:05 am
A Texas-based organization of churches has filed suit against the city of Austin claiming that the city's non-discrimination ordinance violates member churches' federal and state constitutional rights and Texas' Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
