Search for: "State v. Texas City" Results 101 - 120 of 2,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2014, 2:53 pm by Amanda Traphagan
  However, Maryland allows this deduction only for its state income taxes, not the portions allocated to cities and counties. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Perez (11-713), on redistricting the state house, Perry v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 5:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In each case, the state told cities like Fort Worth, Freeport, Fisco, Lubbock, Pflugerville, DeSoto and College Station that the "requestor did not properly request the body worn camera recordings," so, "it need not be released. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm by Brandon Jubelirer
The Texas Public Policy Foundation, in connection with Forbes Magazine, published an article in 2016 ranking cities across the United States for per capita fines, fees, and forfeitures. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 8:13 am by Texas Employment Law Letter
But Pidgeon and Hicks are in for an uphill battle since their argument is contrary to an order upheld by a federal appeals court shortly after Obergefell stating that officials in Texas and other states were forbidden from enforcing any state law “prohibiting a person from marrying another person of the same sex or recognizing same-sex marriage” (De Leon v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 9:26 am by Michael Lowe
  Sometimes, sophisticated routes are established between cities or states so prostitutes can rotate from place to place. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
On November 3, 2015, voters in Houston, Texas, the nation’s fourth largest city, soundly rejected a proposed equal rights ordinance which sought to outlaw discrimination based upon sexual orientation and gender identity in city employment, city services, city contracting practices, housing, public accommodations and private employment. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:22 am by NCC Staff
Breyer and the majority cited a previous Supreme Court decision, Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 10:21 pm by Unknown
As plaintiff is a Texas resident, and his sole remaining retaliation claim is asserted under a section of the Texas Labor Law, the motion court providently exercised its discretion in dismissing that claim on the ground of forum non conveniens, pursuant to CPLR 327[a].Kingston v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 2:30 am by Victoria VanBuren
However, the arbitration section did not indicate whether state or federal law would apply, providing only that “[a]ll proceedings shall be conducted in the City of Dallas, State of Texas.” [read post]