Search for: "State v. Texas City" Results 121 - 140 of 2,787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2015, 8:22 am by NCC Staff
Breyer and the majority cited a previous Supreme Court decision, Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 2:30 am by Victoria VanBuren
However, the arbitration section did not indicate whether state or federal law would apply, providing only that “[a]ll proceedings shall be conducted in the City of Dallas, State of Texas. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm by Brandon Jubelirer
The Texas Public Policy Foundation, in connection with Forbes Magazine, published an article in 2016 ranking cities across the United States for per capita fines, fees, and forfeitures. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:41 am
Tags: Administrative, Amicus Curiae, Texas Amici Society Related posts Amicus Brief in US v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:53 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Since in the Lone Star State it would have been legal to arrest the driver over the burnt out bulb (after Atwater v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:30 pm
After all, City inspector had given the road a passing grade of "C".City of Dallas v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
On November 3, 2015, voters in Houston, Texas, the nation’s fourth largest city, soundly rejected a proposed equal rights ordinance which sought to outlaw discrimination based upon sexual orientation and gender identity in city employment, city services, city contracting practices, housing, public accommodations and private employment. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 1:36 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court today granted certiorari in Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 6:35 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law Judge Orlando Garcia's opinion in DeLeon v. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 10:21 pm by Unknown
As plaintiff is a Texas resident, and his sole remaining retaliation claim is asserted under a section of the Texas Labor Law, the motion court providently exercised its discretion in dismissing that claim on the ground of forum non conveniens, pursuant to CPLR 327[a].Kingston v. [read post]