Search for: "State v. Thomas" Results 261 - 280 of 14,254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2011, 3:15 pm
On May 26, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 6:30 pm by Ernster the Virtual Library Cat
Today the United States Supreme court decided a case that is both high profile and right on point for aspiring law students, at the intersection of constitutional law and professional responsibility. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:38 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Thomas, University of Akron School of Law, has posted a new paper: Back to the Future of Regulating Abortion in the First Term. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:39 am by Derek Black
On September 7, Superior Court Judge Thomas Moukawser issued his post-trial decision, in Connecticut Coalition for Justice in Education Funding (CCJEF) v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  Now according to a press release from the Thomas More Society, the state of Missouri has begun to offer all state employees the option of selecting a health insurance plan that excludes coverage for abortion, contraceptives or sterilization. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
Thomas does not believe that politics in any sense of that term — electoral politics, social movements, state action and regulation, organizing, even more radical notions of transformative change — can positively affect black people; he thinks politics mostly hurts black people. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 10:35 am
Thomas - Minnesota) Returning to the PruneYard: The Unconstitutionality of State-Sanctioned Trespass in the Name of Speech on SSRN. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:42 am by Ben Sheffner
In his original order, Judge Davis declined to reach the constitutional issues, citing United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:21 pm
In earlier posts in the series, I noted that Thomas’ deference to the use of racial classifications in the prison context in Johnson v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For the proposition that regulations that would have been valid in 1791 are valid today, Justice Thomas cites one case, the 2010 ruling in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:29 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, in which the majority consisted of Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, and Sotomayor, suggests that this might have been the first time that Justice Thomas assigned a Supreme Court majority opinion (in this case, to Justice Breyer). [read post]