Search for: "State v. Thomas"
Results 621 - 640
of 13,699
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2009, 11:14 am
US (opinion) and Oregon v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 12:42 pm
On May 16, Justice Thomas issued the majority opinion in which the Supreme Court held, by a 7-2 vote, that the CFPB’s funding mechanism comported with the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution which states, in relevant part, in Article I, Section 9, Clause 7: “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law…” Specifically, Justice Thomas held: “Under the Appropriations Clause, an… [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 9:45 am
In a recent unpublished opinion, Grand Cru LLC d/b/a Restaurant Nicholas v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 9:45 am
In a recent unpublished opinion, Grand Cru LLC d/b/a Restaurant Nicholas v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 7:49 am
Parker v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:41 am
To the surprise of many observers, however, the Court ruled 5-4 (Thomas, with Roberts, Kennedy, and Alito dissenting) in favor of the State of New York (Cuomo). [read post]
7 May 2009, 11:51 am
The point of this post is that Justice Thomas wrote the majority opinion and held that the case was clearly covered by the 1976 case Thermtron Products, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 10:30 pm
As the United States Supreme Court wrote in Chessman v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 8:51 am
Harris, formerly known as McCrory v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:50 am
Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:56 am
Thomas Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-26.State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:25 pm
Conn On March 18, 2013, President Obama nominated Thomas E. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
United States (06-11543) is now available here. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 11:46 am
Thomas R. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 6:24 pm
Thomas v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:21 am
Once again the RIAA has commenced a "John Doe" case targeting North Carolina State University students, this one entitled Arista v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
In Connick v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 8:05 am
In particular, I have been thinking about it as a result of a gut feeling that the ‘2 v. 3’ debate is largely occurring within a vacuum, with not enough attention being paid to the current (beleaguered) state of the United States’ higher education system as a whole. [read post]