Search for: "State v. Thomas" Results 141 - 160 of 11,401
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
" This prohibition on federal courts enjoining state courts does not apply to Section 1983 suits because the Supreme Court has unequivocally held in Mitchum v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 9:38 am by Tom Smith
In July, Kavanaugh and Barrett joined the court’s leftist majority in declining to hear Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:17 pm by Cyberleagle
There is a question, on the wording of the draft Bill, as to whether a service provider can state that ‘we do nothing about this kind of harmful content’. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 10:43 am by Amy Howe
When Wednesday’s oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 10:26 am by John Elwood
In both cases, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch noted that they would have granted the petitions. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:59 pm by Amy Howe
Thomas later returned to the question, asking Morris whether a legislature could sanction a private citizen. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court gets ready to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:40 pm by Ilya Somin
But if your creative effort to attack abortion rights gives even Thomas (perhaps the current Court's toughest critic of Roe v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:45 pm by Amy Howe
An intermediate state appellate court upheld the regulation, concluding that it is a “neutral and generally applicable” rule that can survive under the court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In both cases, the state and some of the most conservative Justices (chiefly Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch) contend that the plaintiffs are trying to expand the kind of relief available beyond what has been previously granted. [read post]