Search for: "State v. Thompson" Results 101 - 120 of 2,412
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
And Perry also supported Texas’s fatally flawed lawsuit against Pennsylvania, his own home state, and three other states. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Through a detailed analysis of the education policies governing gender identity in each state and each state’s largest school district, the Article documents the substantive requirements for living consistently with one’s gender identity in school (for example, providing medical documentation v. self-identification) and the different stakeholders enshrined in procedurally assessing students’ gender. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by Mary Moynihan
Pritchard and Thompson argue that the Court permitted the SEC to fill in statutory gaps to attack insider trading and overtake areas of state authority, even extending implied federal rights of action to shareholders in the case of Superintendent of Ins. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 10:53 am by Anna Bower
Broadly speaking, development of the term in federal and state common law courts resulted in two distinct yet overlapping meanings. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 1:44 am by Steve Lubet
            In 1949, federal district trial Judge Harold Medina issued criminal contempt specifications against the five lawyers representing the eleven members of the Communist Party tried and convicted of conspiracy in the case titled United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm by Rob Robinson
The first, the Thompson Memorandum, was released in 2003, stating as one of its express purposes to place “increased emphasis on and scrutiny of the authenticity of a corporation’s cooperation. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Claire Hill
Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Sotomayor hit on one aspect of the problem with Thompson's argument when she referred to the "legal morass" entailed by distinguishing substantive from procedural rules, but the case she cited, Mistretta v. [read post]