Search for: "State v. Thorne" Results 101 - 120 of 161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 7:08 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Djanogly v Westminster City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 432 (19 April 2011) ZZ v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 440 (19 April 2011) Thorne v Courtier & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 460 (19 April 2011) CMA- CGM Marseille v Petro Broker International [2011] EWCA Civ 461 (19 April 2011) Sandhu (t/a Isher Fashions UK) v Jet Star Retail Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 459 (19 April 2011) … [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 12:54 pm by Douglas Reiser
Athletic Field – The Thorn In Your Lien No case has garnered more attention on this blog than the ruling in Williams v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 2:01 pm by Matthew Nelson
The Court administratively closed Thorne v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:23 pm by Veronika Gaertner
The authors criticise the recent ECJ judgment in Wood Floor Solutions Andreas Domberger GmbH v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
(That is why analogies between the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of ECUSA are inapt.) [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 4:30 am by Stephanie Flynn
Since the 1990s, EIFS litigation has been a thorn in the side of the construction and insurance industries. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:52 am by Stefanie Levine
Written by Gene Quinn (of IPWatchdog.com and Practice Center Contributor) The United States Patent and Trademark Office has provided an update to its Examination Guidelines concerning the law of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 in light of precedential decisions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued since the 2007 decision by the United States Supreme Court in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 2:39 am
And its the very issue of costs, be it in production, overheads or libel litigation, that is thorn in the newspaper industry's paw. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 4:19 pm by Eugene Volokh
A few weeks ago, I noticed that the Westlaw version of Thorn v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm
The reasoning of these decisions varied at times, but the theme was consistent and widely understood that "a series of steps for conducting business could not be patented" (at pages 26-27 of his decision Justice Stevens cited several such cases including US Credit Sys Co v American Credit Indem Co (1893), Hotel Security Checking Co v Lorraine Co (1908), Loew's Drive-In Theatres, Inc v Park-In Theatres, Inc (1949)). [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:06 pm by Jamie C. Chanin
State of California, 18 Cal.3d 808, 814 (1977) (specifying retirement benefits are deemed part of a compensation package and may only be conferred by board action); County of Riverside v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:50 pm by Rosalind English
Responding to that statement, Laws LJ made a number of (now well publicised) observations, which, though vigorously stated, are hardly controversial, upholding the need for a principled approach in the application of law. [read post]