Search for: "State v. Thornton"
Results 1 - 20
of 393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2025, 2:54 am
For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is denied. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 9:30 pm
A double issue (7:3-4) of The Docket, the on-line companion to Law and History Review, has been posted: Gautham Rao: Dispatches from a Challenging YearTim Thornton: The Isle of Man, Channel Islands and Statutes of the English Parliament to 1640Lawrence Goldstone: Arms and the Common Man: Standing Army, Militia, and the Second Amendment in the United States.Ryan Reft: United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm
In Cadwalladr, the Court of Appeal also confirmed that “publication” for the purposes of section 1(1) (and indeed, the 2013 Act as a whole unless otherwise stated) continued to have its common law meaning – a communication of the statement to someone other than the claimant – and that each single communication is a separate and actionable tort. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 3:44 am
Yesterday, 2 December, there was a short debate in the House of Lords on a Question tabled by Baroness Thornton (Lab) and asked on the day by Lord Dubs (Lab), asking His Majesty’s Government whether they conducted an equality impact assessment following the judgment in R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] concerning humanist marriages. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 9:38 am
From Judge David Alan Ezra's decision in Penders v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:54 am
Baroness Thornton asked the Government whether they planned to give legal recognition to humanist weddings, to which Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice, replied: “The Government understand humanists’ strength of feeling about legally recognising humanist weddings. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 12:42 pm
In Bufkin v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
Thornton. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 10:26 am
States had quite different visions for the regime. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 8:26 am
Hobbs provided a thorough review of the relevant case law on recusals, including a reference to the UK Post Office scandal in Bates v Post Office Limited [2019] EWHC 871 (QB), paragraphs [27]-[77] as well as HCA International Ltd v Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) [2015] EWCA Civ 492. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 8:43 am
Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd., Thornton v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm
The size of the Supreme Court did increase from 6 justices at the founding, to 7 and then 9, before 1861, as the population and number of states in the union increased exponentially. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:58 am
In Bufkin v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:08 am
Veterans Joshua Bufkin and Norman Thornton were each denied benefits despite evidence that appeared to be in “approximate balance. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:50 pm
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (Negligence) Thornton v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:07 am
Thornton, a divided Supreme Court ruled that states could not add qualifications for office for members of Congress in addition to those explicitly stated in the Constitution. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:49 am
Thornton, 514 U. [read post]