Search for: "State v. Thornton" Results 1 - 20 of 393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2025, 9:30 pm by ernst
A double issue (7:3-4) of The Docket, the on-line companion to Law and History Review, has been posted:    Gautham Rao: Dispatches from a Challenging YearTim Thornton: The Isle of Man, Channel Islands and Statutes of the English Parliament to 1640Lawrence Goldstone: Arms and the Common Man: Standing Army, Militia, and the Second Amendment in the United States.Ryan Reft: United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
In Cadwalladr, the Court of Appeal also confirmed that “publication” for the purposes of section 1(1) (and indeed, the 2013 Act as a whole unless otherwise stated) continued to have its common law meaning – a communication of the statement to someone other than the claimant – and that each single communication is a separate and actionable tort. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 3:44 am by Frank Cranmer
Yesterday, 2 December, there was a short debate in the House of Lords on a Question tabled by Baroness Thornton (Lab) and asked on the day by Lord Dubs (Lab), asking His Majesty’s Government whether they conducted an equality impact assessment following the judgment in R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] concerning humanist marriages. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:54 am by Frank Cranmer
Baroness Thornton asked the Government whether they planned to give legal recognition to humanist weddings, to which Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice, replied: “The Government understand humanists’ strength of feeling about legally recognising humanist weddings. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 8:26 am by Eleonora Rosati
Hobbs provided a thorough review of the relevant case law on recusals, including a reference to the UK Post Office scandal in Bates v Post Office Limited [2019] EWHC 871 (QB), paragraphs [27]-[77] as well as HCA International Ltd v Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) [2015] EWCA Civ 492. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm by Steven Calabresi
The size of the Supreme Court did increase from 6 justices at the founding, to 7 and then 9, before 1861, as the population and number of states in the union increased exponentially. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:08 am by John Elwood
Veterans Joshua Bufkin and Norman Thornton were each denied benefits despite evidence that appeared to be in “approximate balance. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:50 pm by NARF
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (Negligence) Thornton v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:07 am by Scott Bomboy
Thornton, a divided Supreme Court ruled that states could not add qualifications for office for members of Congress in addition to those explicitly stated in the Constitution. [read post]