Search for: "State v. Thorp"
Results 61 - 80
of 131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2015, 8:10 am
Background to the Story On October 23, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia determined that NAGPRA does not apply to the requested repatriation of Jim Thorpe’s remains. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:08 am
. #1 1491s v. #9 Cobell settlement beneficiaries The 1491s love Jim Thorpe (I think) but not his captor, winning with 93 percent of the vote. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 8:15 am
Had lunch. v. # 16 Borough of Jim Thorpe Won NAGPRA case in the Third Circuit. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 4:10 am
New Mexico state government Senate Committee on Indian Affairs Tribal In-House Counsel Assn. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:29 am
”John Thorpe MP put the State firmly ahead of the individual:“… In my view the State is in great danger, and no power which would tend to protect it should be withheld from the Government. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 10:11 am
Borough of Thorpe (Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, definition of museum)Becker v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:23 am
"All this is compliant with the GAT and Folien decisions and the Corte di Cassazione ruling, as well the UK decision in Joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) and Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [here]. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 5:52 am
The style of the case is, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm
Thorpe 8. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
” Patete v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:44 pm
Air Lines, 333 U.S. at 113; United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 3:02 am
People v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am
Thorpe Insulation Co., Superior Ct Calif., Los Angeles Cty. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:01 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 11:35 am
Thorpe (Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act)Bristol Bay Area Health Corp. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:52 am
Stat. (2010), Thorpe v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
Petrodell v Prest appeal to be heard by the Supreme CourtThe Court of Appeal, comprising Lord Justices Thorpe, Rimer and Patten, have given permission to Yasmin Prest to appeal to the Supreme Court against its decision in Petrodell Resources Limited v Prest [2012] EWCA Civ 1395. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 1:34 am
The Gray v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor case - see below. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:42 pm
The principles set out in Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] A.C. 22 were stated to apply to all jurisdictions and the principles of legal personality had to be respected. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
Washington State Democratic Central Committee v. [read post]
