Search for: "State v. Thorp" Results 81 - 100 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2017, 11:33 am by Giles Peaker
The question in cases which turn on an intention to return, as explained by Thorpe LJ in Camden LBC v Goldenberg (1996) 28 HLR 727 at 733, is whether a period of absence breaks the continuity of residence. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am by Emma Kent
Back in 2000 in the House of Lords case White v White, Lord Thorpe stated that the calculation is ‘a tool not a rule’. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 10:43 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
”); In re Thorpe, 777 F.2d 695, 697 (Fed. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:51 am by Madeleine Reardon, 1 Kings Bench Walk.
Finally, after the conclusion of the judgment, the Court added a ‘postscript’ expressing concern at the recent re-statement by the ECtHR in X v Latvia (App no 27853/09) that Hague Convention cases demanded an in-depth examination of the entire family situation (as initially expressed, controversially, in Neulinger and Shuruk v Switzerland [2011] 1 FLR 122), and stating its conviction that such an in-depth examination is not required either by the terms of the… [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:07 am by New Books Script
KF 505 ZC2 D528 2012 Family law, gender and the state / Alison Diduck and Felicity Kaganas. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office practice regarding legal expenses in oppositions (The IP Factor)   New Zealand New Zealand launches second ACTA consultation (Michael Geist)   United Kingdom EWHC request for summary judgment denied - OHIM-IPO class heading conflict case: Daimler v Sany (IPKat)   United States US General Trade secret litigation on the rise against laid off employees (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Seeking and justifying attorney… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:32 pm by Chris Martin
We first asked our editors whether recoupment was permitted in their states: California (Sara Thorpe) California has definitive and strong law on an insurer's right to recoup both defense costs (Buss v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:29 am by Graham Smith
”John Thorpe MP put the State firmly ahead of the individual:“… In my view the State is in great danger, and no power which would tend to protect it should be withheld from the Government. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
In the wake of the recent BBC drama about Jeremy Thorpe, the Sun on Sunday has a piece about his barrister, George Carman QC. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
All three Claimants in Blake, Seymour and Thorp v Fox [2021] EWHC 3463 (QB) were granted relief from sanctions for failure to serve a Reply and Defence to the counterclaim, and no order was made on the Defendant’s application for Default Judgement. [read post]