Search for: "State v. Tillman" Results 1 - 20 of 292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2010, 11:20 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994), and State v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Section V analyzes the Oath or Affirmation Clause, which suggests that Senators and Representatives, as well as the President, are not “Officers of the United States. [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Section V reviews an anti-bribery statute enacted by the first Congress. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:17 am
Seth Barrett Tillman (United States District Court, PA) has posted The Puzzle of Hamilton's Federalist No. 77: It Turns Out Hamilton Was Right after All on SSRN. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:46 pm by Lawrence Solum
One short year after publication, in 2010, Anti-Corruption Principle was relied upon by Justice Stevens in his Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:26 am by Lawrence Solum
One short year after publication, in 2010, Anti-Corruption Principle was relied upon by Justice Stevens in his Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:50 am
"After Words with Roberta Kaplan: Roberta Kaplan talked about her book Then Comes Marriage: United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:38 pm by Jon Levitan
., the State and Local Legal Center will host a webinar titled, “Internet Sales Tax: From 1967 to Oral Argument in South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 2:30 pm by Andrew Hamm
., the State and Local Legal Center and the Native American Law Student Association at Georgetown Law will host a panel discussion on South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm by Josh Blackman
Calabresi now agrees with Tillman that the President is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Nor does the “engage” prong extend to inaction—for example, failing to take action with regard to an insurrection or rebellion.Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
" Part V will respond to recent academic arguments suggesting that the President is an "officer of the United States" for purposes of Section 3. [read post]