Search for: "State v. Tillman" Results 81 - 100 of 295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  And strangely, Part II-A of Professor Tillman’s brief devotes six pages to arguing (mistakenly) that “[i]n the Constitution of 1788, the President did not hold an ‘Office … under the United States,'” without arguing that the same is true in Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment—let alone that the alleged limited meaning of that phrase in 1788 is a reason for reversing the Colorado Supreme Court.) [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: The World and Everything in It features discussions of Ziglar v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:45 am by Laura Donohue
The controversy over the Second Bank of the United States, ostensibly settled in McCullough v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:47 am by Amy Howe
  Zoe Tillman reports for the Blog of Legal Times. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
“The Delaware State Bar Association is set to host a CLE program titled “Delaware and Desegregation: Belton v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 10:25 am
Alexandra Klass and Eva Tillman, principal counsel for condemnation of the Baltimore Solicitor’s Office. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am by Cormac Early
 Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle has coverage of the brief submitted by California Attorney General Kamala Harris, while Zoe Tillman of the Blog of Legal Times reports on the District of Columbia’s decision to join a brief with fourteen states and the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
At Rewire.News, Imani Gandy remarks that in Husted v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
An employee with chronic back pain who took intermittent FMLA leave for more than two years, and was fired after his employer became suspicious of the patterns in the timing of his leave requests, could not advance FMLA interference and retaliation claims, ruled the Sixth Circuit ruled in an unpublished opinion (Tillman v Ohio Bell Telephone Co, October 8, 2013, per curiam). [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Former LHB Guest Blogger Mary Ziegler, Florida State College of Law, discusses the history of the“fetal personhood” movement as part of a National Constitution Center podcast on Box v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
For more than a decade, Tillman has written that the phrase "Office . . . under the United States" reaches only appointed federal positions. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 9:34 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The Court of Criminal Appeals cited the New Jersey ruling in their own landmark eyewitness ID case last year, State v. [read post]