Search for: "State v. Town of Grants" Results 81 - 100 of 1,648
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 3:36 am
Termination from Civil Service Law §71 Workers’ Compensation LeaveMatter of Richard Lazzari v Town of Eastchester, 62 AD3d 1002§71 of the Civil Service Law provides for the granting of “workers’ compensation leave” to an employee of the State or a political subdivision of the State who is disabled as the result of a work-connected injury or disease where such injury or disease does not [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
Removal of an officer of a political subdivision of the State for misconduct, maladministration, malfeasance or malversation in officeMatter of Hedman v Town Bd. of Town of Howard, 2008 NY Slip Op 09229, decided on November 21, 2008, Appellate Division, Fourth Department Gerald S. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:29 pm
Matter of Woodland Community Association v Planning Board of Town of Shandaken This article 78 appeal was brought against a judgment dismissing petitioners’ application to review a determination of respondent Planning Board of the Town of Shandaken granting respondent Good Water Corporation’s application for site plan approval and a special use permit. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:51 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
‘They exercise such authority solely by legislative grant’ (Matter of Kamhi v Planning Bd. of Town of Yorktown, 59 NY2d at 389; see Town of Huntington v Beechwood Carmen Bldg. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
  He then examined our own rich jurisprudence on the issue – the leading case being Independent Newspapers v Minister for Intelligence. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
” Although the Town contended that demand for arbitration was untimely, Supreme Court granted the Associations’ petition. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 12:02 pm by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Sovereign Immunity and the Distinction Between Discretionary and Ministerial Duties The district court granted summary judgment to all of the governmental defendants on the plaintiff’s claims, ruling that the school, the board, and the town were immune from negligence claims under the state’s governmental immunity statute. [read post]