Search for: "State v. Tucker"
Results 101 - 120
of 743
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2008, 11:31 am
The defendant in State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 4:05 am
In Tucker v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 4:34 am
Here is an excerpt from that case:This case requires us to reexamine the jurisdictional boundary between the Tucker Act and the Administrative Procedure Act, as that boundary is understood in the light of the Supreme Court's decision in Bowen v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:38 am
State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 6:16 am
But never have I read a dissent like this, from Tucker v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 3:00 pm
Manceri of Fort Lauderdale, Florida was on the winning side of Jervis v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 9:29 am
ComerToday's case brief is Anderson v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:02 am
Tucker Higgins reports at CNBC on friend-of-the-court briefs filed in support of the city in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 7:27 am
" The case is Tucker v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
On May 19, 2022, Cornell penned an article castigating in advance the Supreme Court for being likely to uphold the right to bear arms in the case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Washburn student intern Sean Whittmore and I won in State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:57 pm
George's work in DC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 12:02 am
United States, No. 2011-1032 (Fed. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:23 am
See, e. g., United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 9:37 am
On February 13, Akin Gump filed this Respondent’s brief in US v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 2:04 pm
Tucker (Dkt. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:35 am
His failure to do so, to pin the blame on Mustafa, when he did blurt out that he wasn't the shooter, undermines the credibility of his trial testimony.The majority held, notably in contrast to the United States Supreme Court's misguided decision in Berghuis v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:04 am
In Ladd v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 2:28 am
In (1) James Robert Tucker (2) Jeremy Spratt (Joint Supervisors of Energy Holdings (No 3)(in liquidation) v Gold Fields Mining LLC [2009] EWCA Civ 173 the Joint Supervisors (JS) of a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) appealed against a decision that they had wrongly excluded a claim form on the grounds that it had been out of time.Gold Fields Mining (GFM) lodged a claim form for $230m in respect of the CVA of Energy Holding (No3) on 21 June 2007, some time after the deadline for… [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 6:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
