Search for: "State v. Tuma" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2012, 6:14 am by Walter James
On June 20, 2012, Cody Tuma was sentenced in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana after having pled guilty to one misdemeanor count of discharges to the Red River in violation of the CWA. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 3:56 pm by Walter James
Cody Tuma the stated that his ability to lie has changed since is religious experience. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:02 am by Walter James
" United States’ Opposition to Defendant John Tuma’s Motion to Continue Trial Date, at 2-3. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 10:34 am by Walter James
”  The government is requesting that the Court make such a finding and depart from the sentencing guidelines pursuant to Section 5K1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines in sentencing Cody Tuma. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:11 am by Walter James
As I stated yesterday, I think the defense may be taking the position that John Tuma was the individual putting all of the controls in place and that Wayne Mallet, Todd Cage and Cody Tuma all conspired to circumvent those controls. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:11 pm by Walter James
The forts witness was then called in theenvironmental crimes trial of U.S. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:25 pm by Walter James
Cage testified that they knew and when pressed he stated that he had told the individual who had trained him at this new employer what had happened. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:57 am by Walter James
Mallet stated that he never talked to anyone from CCS before the acquisition and that John Tuma did all the explaining. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:55 am by Walter James
Tubbs’ background with included service with the United States Coast Guard as a spill response pollution investigator. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm by Julie Lam
In lieu of granting leave to appeal in Beebe v Hartman, No. 142315, the Michigan Supreme Court vacated Part III B of the Court of Appeals’ opinion, for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals’ concurring opinion. [read post]
19 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Austin Chronicle, Mary Tuma reports that the reproductive health provider at the center of the court’s most recent abortion rights ruling, Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
By the time the case reached the Supreme Court, the Texas law had closed half the abortion clinics in the state. [read post]