Search for: "State v. Tunney"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2016, 3:13 pm
Tunney stressed. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 4:00 pm
District Court Schedules Tunney Act Hearing On November 30, 2006 at 2pm, the U.S. [read post]
4 May 2007, 6:19 pm
Court of Appeals decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 6:53 pm
“Through these two avenues, [Kohn] was given a full opportunity to express his personal views on the Government’s theory of the case and the state of competition in the e-books market. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:34 pm
Here’s an example, from State v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 6:19 am
” (Frew v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 12:36 pm
”For a more recent, but factually rather different, § 403 case, see McMahon v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 1:14 pm
The October 2, 2012, decision in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:42 pm
”For a more recent, but factually rather different, § 403 case, see McMahon v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:25 pm
., Appellants, v. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:05 am
Penn State Hershey Medical Center and Pinnacle Health System called off plans to merge after the U.S. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
Amusement Park Regulation’s Bumpy Ride August 31, 2022 | William Tunney A patchwork of state and private industry oversight leaves room for federal intervention. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
In Credit Lyonnaise Bank Nederland N.V. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:14 pm
Tunney). [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:18 am
While publication of the public comments and the U.S. response is required by the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, also known as the Tunney Act, the law was amended in 2004 to permit the Justice Department to make public comments on a consent decree available through means other than the Federal Register.Opposition to Suit or SettlementThe vast majority of the comments opposed the suit and/or the settlement. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court case Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:53 pm
The September 6, 2012, opinion in U.S. v. [read post]