Search for: "State v. Turner" Results 21 - 40 of 1,309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the defendants demonstrated, prima facie, that the acts that they allegedly failed to perform were beyond the scope of the engagement letter, which was prepared by the defendants and signed by the plaintiff (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d at 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 8:23 am
Turner Construction Co., 560 F.Supp. 871 (S.D.N.Y.1983), went the other way. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:55 am by Daniel Carpenter-Gold
Yesterday, the UCLA Environmental Law Clinic filed a brief in the California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
The cases include those brought by the Duke of Sussex, Nikki Sanderson, Fiona Wightman and Michael Turner. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:30 am by Daniel Carpenter-Gold
Photo from Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0).On Monday, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Thomas gave us the answer in his opening paragraph in his brutal dissent in Grutter v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (1993), on the standards for expert testimony, with 24 departing states, United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 10:39 am by Avery Schmitz
Department of State; Jewellord (Jojo) Nem Singh, assistant professor at the International Institute of Social Studies at Erasmus University Rotterdam; and Jennifer Turner, director of the China Environment Forum. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Second, the limits imposed by Rawls' ideal of public reason do not apply to all actions by the state or even to all coercive uses of state power. [read post]