Search for: "State v. Valenzuela"
Results 1 - 20
of 67
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2025, 1:38 pm
In Valenzuela v. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 1:38 pm
In Valenzuela v. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 1:38 pm
In Valenzuela v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 12:18 pm
Valenzuela v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:03 am
Valenzuela, joined by Justices Luz Elena D. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 11:47 am
Valenzuela 21-1598Issue: Whether under Robertson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 10:47 am
Valenzuela v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 9:05 am
Arizona v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:23 am
CMB Entertainment, LLC et al v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 4:57 pm
Arizona courts have held that if a person was coerced by the officer to take the DUI test then their consent is not voluntary (State of Arizona v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 7:10 am
Juror Rehabilitation in a Death Penalty Case The Supreme Court of the State of Arizona issued an opinion in State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
” Arizona v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am
Goodrich, 480 Fed.Appx. 489 (10th Cir. 2012) (dismissing ICRA habeas claim as moot) Valenzuela v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
United States, 961 F.2d 17, 20-22 (1st Cir. 1992); United States v. [read post]
21 May 2016, 4:45 pm
Valenzuela 4/16, citing Bumper) A DUI Test is not voluntary if consent was the result of coercion or duress (State v. [read post]
21 May 2016, 4:45 pm
Valenzuela 4/16, citing Bumper) A DUI Test is not voluntary if consent was the result of coercion or duress (State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:48 pm
Valenzuela, No. 12-55041 (Berzon with Pregerson and Wardlaw) --- The Ninth Circuit vacated and remanded the dismissal of a California state prisoner's § 2254 habeas petition, holding that a magistrate judge lacked the authority to rule on a motion for stay and abeyance under Rhines v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Lopez-Valenzuela, 14-825, which sought review of the Ninth Circuit’s decision striking down Arizona’s Proposition 100 and holding that a denial of bail is permissible only after individualized assessment of flight risk or future dangerousness. [read post]
