Search for: "State v. Van Buren" Results 1 - 20 of 182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2024, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
Van Buren made clear that losses under the CFAA must be technological in nature, and there must be actual harm to computer systems, data, or information to state a claim under the CFAA. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 11:27 am by Eric Goldman
” Instead, the court looks to see if Twitter properly alleged special damages, such as consequential damages (Hadley v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:36 am by Eric Goldman
Ark. 2019) (stating that “[t]he fact that the [confidentiality] Agreement does not state a time limitation, but instead applies forever, further supports a finding that it is unenforceable”); Howard Schultz & Assocs. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 10:18 am by Katitza Rodriguez
In the Supreme Court's Van Buren case for example, the Justice Department argued that a police officer who used a law enforcement database for an unauthorized purpose engaged in authorized access because his use was not allowed in the applicable use policy. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am by SHG
Leaving the jockey shorts in the Van Buren flats was a part of Mr. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
” The Court reiterated Van Buren’s concern that a wide interpretation of CFAA would make it a “sweeping internet-policing mandate”.Sidis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 3:13 pm
The Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated the panel’s judgment, and remanded for further consideration in light of Van Buren v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 11:43 am by Eric Goldman
” Old-school CFAA nerds might recall that this fact pattern largely harks back to the criminal prosecution of United States v. [read post]