Search for: "State v. Van Cross" Results 1 - 20 of 460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2015, 4:42 am by Kate Fort
Van Hunnick developed and implemented policies and procedures for the removal of Indian children from their parents’ custody in violation of the mandates of the Indian Child Welfare Act and in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:57 am by Lindsay See
Kurtzman into the more historical and context-based analysis that five justices (across four opinions) found appropriate for passive monument challenges over a decade ago in Van Orden v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 1:42 pm by Orin Kerr
You lack sufficient cause to stop the van to investigate an immigration offense, but you notice that the van is speeding in violation of state traffic law. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The District Court granted summary judgment for the Commission and the American Legion, concluding that the Cross satisfies both the test announced in Lemon and the analysis applied by Justice Stephen Breyer in upholding a Ten Commandments monument in Van Orden v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am by Matheu Nunn
A Federal District Court judge ruled in favor of the “Cross”, relying on the Lemon test, as well as Justice Breyer’s analysis in Van  Orden  v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am by Matheu Nunn
A Federal District Court judge ruled in favor of the “Cross”, relying on the Lemon test, as well as Justice Breyer’s analysis in Van  Orden  v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am by Matheu Nunn
A Federal District Court judge ruled in favor of the “Cross”, relying on the Lemon test, as well as Justice Breyer’s analysis in Van  Orden  v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am by Matheu Nunn
A Federal District Court judge ruled in favor of the “Cross”, relying on the Lemon test, as well as Justice Breyer’s analysis in Van  Orden  v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
  “[W]ith Pistorius”, said Ponnan JA in the Van Breda appeal, “the Rubicon had been crossed. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
Van Colle (administrator of the estate of GC (deceased)) and another (Original-Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) Smith (Respondent) v Chief Constable of Sussex Police (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 50 (30 July 2008) Caldarelli (Appellant) v Court of Naples (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 51 (30 July 2008) R (on… [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:07 am by Marci Hamilton
ACLU of Kentucky that a Ten Commandments display in a Kentucky county courthouse was unconstitutional but, in Van Orden v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 4:42 am by INFORRM
Earlier this month we posted about a privacy injunction obtained by the singer Van Morrison against the News of the World. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 9:11 pm
Kyazze, Walking the walk: Evidence of Principles in Action from Red Cross and Red Crescent National Societies Phoebe Wynn-Pope, Yvette Zegenhagen & Fauve Kurnadi, Legislating against humanitarian principles: A case study on the humanitarian implications of Australian counterterrorism legislation Katrien Beeckman, From Fundamental Principles to individual action: Making the Principles come alive to promote a culture of non-violence and peace Ed Schenkenberg van Mierop,… [read post]