Search for: "State v. Van Winkle" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2021, 9:30 am by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
[As written by Rip Van Winkle on June 15, 2021] In early March 2020, I fell asleep upon drinking my favorite beverage on a California beach. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:21 am by John Rubin
As in the story of Rip Van Winkle, a lot has changed in twenty years. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:21 am by John Rubin
As in the story of Rip Van Winkle, a lot has changed in twenty years. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 6:59 am
Van Winkle & Co., 402 F.3d 1129, 1132 (11th Cir.2005); United States v. 2,164 Watches, More or Less, Bearing a Registered Trademark of Guess? [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
  They made no distinction between an officer, which included the president, an officer of the United States, and an officer under the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:37 pm by Neel Kant Agrawal
Next week’s presentation, hosted by the Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, will feature the research of two globally engaged UW J.D. candidates: Andrew Van Winkle will present Separation of Religion and State in Japan: A Pragmatic Interpretation of Articles 20 and 89 of the Japanese ConstitutionGreg Chiarella will present Sources of law, Sources of Authority: The Failure of the Code of Muslim Personal Laws of the Philippines. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:37 pm by Neel Kant Agrawal
Next week’s presentation, hosted by the Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, will feature the research of two globally engaged UW J.D. candidates: Andrew Van Winkle will present Separation of Religion and State in Japan: A Pragmatic Interpretation of Articles 20 and 89 of the Japanese ConstitutionGreg Chiarella will present Sources of law, Sources of Authority: The Failure of the Code of Muslim Personal Laws of the Philippines. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Van Winkle and Co., 402 F.3d 1129, 1132-1133 (11th Cir. 2005)(and cases cited therein). [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 5:25 am by Richard Hunt
See, “A bipartisan solution to stopping drive-by lawsuits” ** There is an excellent survey of the law on standing in an ADA context in the recent decision Van Winkle v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
  No.Someone must have been the second coming of Rip Van Winkle and slept through the last five years. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Sixty Famous Cases 10 v. (1956) Van Winkle, Marshall. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 3:29 am
The Court distinguished In re Salinas and stated that Van Winkle v. [read post]