Search for: "State v. Vanness" Results 261 - 280 of 3,068
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:01 am by Maksym Vishchyk
Specifically, criminal law instruments on terrorism cannot serve to criminalize mere participation in hostilities (Van Poecke et al. (2021) 297). [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am by Patryk I. Labuda
Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice Beth van Schaack, arguing last year that “[w]e cannot overlook the growing perception by many states, especially from the Global South, that the concerted response to Ukraine is a stark exception. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:32 am by INFORRM
Earlier in July 2023, a blog post by Jacob van de Kerkhof discussed the shortcomings of the recent Grand Chamber judgment in Sanchez v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 10:18 am by Katitza Rodriguez
  If the Member States can’t reach total consensus on the text, it could go to a vote by the Member State governments in which a two-thirds majority would be required for adoption. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
One of the leading authorities in the area of promotional liability is the Weirum v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am by Ralf Michaels
Nor do we want to add to the lively discussion on the choice-of-law- aspects regarding civil liability (see, amongst others, van Calster, Ho-Dac, Dias and, before the Proposal, Rühl). [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 12:16 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Majekolagbe, Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 11:10 am by Giles Peaker
By this point, her stated view was that she no longer wished to return to the property. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:30 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Kebebew, Dispute over the Status and Use of the Waters of the Silala (Chile v Bolivia): Is the International Court of Justice falling short? [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]