Search for: "State v. Velasquez"
Results 1 - 20
of 85
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2024, 10:07 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Other states have similar, recent decisions [see Western Millwork v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:39 am
That statute is at the heart of a recent appellate court decision, Velasquez v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 10:38 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]
13 May 2023, 10:46 am
” In re Marriage of Velasquez, 692 NE 2d 841 – Ill: Appellate Court, 3rd Dist. 1998 After a divorce with a complete and comprehensive division of assets and debts…what else could a couple go back to court for? [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 10:43 am
On April 10, in People of California v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 4:57 am
Velasquez), without any written opposition, and was then granted on defendant’s default by order dated March 1, 2022. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 12:29 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
’”Eli Velasquez, Founder & Managing Partner at Investors of Color Network, responding to questions posed by Rep. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 1:26 pm
Alan Mygatt-Tauber, Medellin v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 3:39 am
In J.D. v Galchus 2022 NY Slip Op 22139 Decided on March 31, 2022 Supreme Court, Queens County Velasquez, J. held just that. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:57 am
” Velasquez-Canales Slip op. at 6. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 11:11 am
State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 6:55 pm
Helpful Links Leymis Velasquez, et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 6:00 am
In Ofman v Tenenbaum Berger & Shivers LLP 2020 NY Slip Op 32828(U) July 23, 2020 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 524482/2019 Judge: Richard Velasquez, Plaintiff alleged that had the attorney been quicker, the defendant would not have been able to leave the US and the judgment would have been collectible. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:09 pm
(v) Their needs in terms of locality to maintain employment and or family support. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
See Maxwell, 588 F.3d at 251; Velasquez v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:56 am
In Palencia v Perez, 2019 WL 1907867 (11th Cir., 2019) the district court concluded that Marilys Velasquez Perez had wrongfully retained her son, H.J.D.V., in the United States and away from Guatemala, his place of habitual residence. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 2:00 am
" State v. [read post]
